Debate!
Posted by
Daniel James
on Monday, February 15, 2010
I'd like to recommend a fascinating debate on the appropriateness of what Christians should put before their eyes.
Begin Here
Hot Air?
Posted by
Daniel James
on Saturday, October 31, 2009
at
12:10 PM
0
comments
|
Labels:
CO2,
Glenn Beck,
Global Warming,
MIT,
Radiation,
Richard Lindzen,
Science
Dream Car
Posted by
Daniel James
on Sunday, April 19, 2009
I don't really have anything to say about this, except, "I'm in love." Enjoy... I sure did.
Hennessey Shelby
What the Cow?!
Posted by
Daniel James
on Monday, February 16, 2009
A friend sent me this article from the WSJ.com , and it literally made me laugh out loud. The first sentence goes like this, "With a $787 billion stimulus package in hand, President Barack Obama will pivot quickly to address a budget deficit that could now approach $2 trillion this year."
Ya think?
He pushed this spending bill through, and then turns around and says, "It's important for us to think in the midterm and long term. And over that midterm and long term, we're going to have to have fiscal discipline. We are not going to be able to perpetually finance the levels of debt that the federal government is currently carrying."
It is for this kind of thing that the phrase, "What the cow?!" was invented.
Hannity's America: 2/11
Posted by
Daniel James
on Thursday, February 12, 2009
I can't say that I particularly like Sean Hannity, but I do like the "Lib-er-Al Translation" segment...
Change is Good
Posted by
Daniel James
on Monday, February 9, 2009
Thanks to S.W. for sending this to me.
Global Warming Scam, Pt. 1
Posted by
Daniel James
on Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Environment minister Sammy Wilson: I still think man-made climate change is a con
Spending billions on trying to reduce carbon emissions is one giant con that is depriving third world countries of vital funds to tackle famine, HIV and other diseases, Sammy Wilson said.
The DUP minister has been heavily criticised by environmentalists for claiming that ongoing climatic shifts are down to nature and not mankind.
But while acknowledging his views on global warming may not be popular, the East Antrim MP said he was not prepared to be bullied by eco fundamentalists.
“I’ll not be stopped saying what I believe needs to be said about climate change,” he said.
"Most of the people who shout about climate change have not read one article about it
“I think in 20 years’ time we will look back at this whole climate change debate and ask ourselves how on earth were we ever conned into spending the billions of pounds which are going into this without any kind of rigorous examination of the background, the science, the implications of it all. Because there is now a degree of hysteria about it, fairly unformed hysteria I’ve got to say as well.
“I mean I get it in the Assembly all the time and most of the people who shout about climate change have not read one article about climate change, not read one book about climate change, if you asked them to explain how they believe there’s a connection between CO2 emission and the effects which they claim there’s going to be, if you ask them to explain the thought process or the modelling that is required and the assumptions behind that and how tenuous all the connections are, they wouldn’t have a clue.
“They simply get letters about it from all these lobby groups, it’s popular and therefore they go along with the flow — and that would be ok if there were no implications for it, but the implications are immense.”
He said while people in the western world were facing spiralling fuel bills as a result of efforts to cut CO2, the implications in poorer countries were graver.
“What are the problems that face us either locally and internationally. Are those not the things we should be concentrating on?” he asked.
“HIV, lack of clean water, which kills millions of people in third world countries, lack of education.
“A fraction of the money we are currently spending on climate change could actually eradicate those three problems alone, a fraction of it.
“I think as a society we sometimes need to get some of these things in perspective and when I listen to some of the rubbish that is spoken by some of my colleagues in the Assembly it amuses me at times and other times it angers me.”
Despite his views on CO2, Mr Wilson said he does not intend to backtrack on commitments made by his predecessor at the Department of the Environment, Arlene Foster, to make the Stormont estate carbon neutral.
He said while he wasn’t worried about reducing CO2 output, he said the policy would help to cut fuels bills.
“I don’t couch those actions in terms of reducing Co2 emissions,” he said. “I don’t care about Co2 emissions to be quite truthful because I don’t think it’s all that important but what I do believe is, and perhaps this is where there can be some convergence, as far as using fuel more efficiently that is good for our economy; that makes us more competitive. If we can save in schools hundreds of thousands on fuel that’s more money being put for books or classroom assistants.
“So yes there are things we can do. If you want to express it terms of carbon neutral, I just express it terms of making the place more efficient, less wasteful and hopefully that will release money to do the proper things that we should be doing.”