The "S" Word




An Obama 'Rescue' Plan That Doesn't

An editorial posted on Investor's Business Daily - Monday, October 13, 2008


Election '08: On the eve of a final debate, Barack Obama unveiled an emergency "rescue" of the middle class from capitalism. The details show it to be all hype and no help.

Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's announcement in Toledo, Ohio, of a "middle-class rescue plan" is reminiscent of Groucho Marx's means of rescuing the drowning damsel who double-crossed him in the film "Horse Feathers."

"Throw me a lifesaver!" she shouted.

Groucho's character, buffoonish college president Quincy Adams Wagstaff, promptly produced from his pocket a roll of peppermint Lifesavers and tossed her one.

Obama's idea of letting people deplete 15% of their 401(k) investment holdings is indicative of the candidate we have come to know, who wants ordinary people to look to the government for money — and not, as has been the trend in recent years, to their investment portfolios. Encourage novice investors to get out and stay out of the stock market right after a historic decline? Only a socialist mind-set would exploit the financial crisis in such a way.

Obama's campaign likes to call the middle class "the economic engine of America." But that engine's fuel is private-sector investment, most of which, naturally, comes from those with higher incomes. This community organizer from Chicago's South Side, whose career was launched with the help of unrepentant Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, will not accept that.

The Illinois senator might be one of the shrewdest presidential candidates ever, but he does slip. For instance, he promises to end capital gains taxes on investments for small businesses and start-ups.

But on a campaign stop in Toledo, he couldn't assure self-employed 34-year-old plumber Joe Wurzelbacher to his face that he would get a tax cut. Poised to buy a $250,000-a-year firm, the working-class plumber of 15 years confronted Obama.

"Your new tax plan is going to tax me more, isn't it?" he asked.

Obama responded with the promise of a 50% tax credit for health care, but the senator conceded that Wurzelbacher's income taxes would indeed rise.

"It's not that I want to punish your success," Obama told him. "I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you — that they've got a chance at success too."

Wurzelbacher, who would shoulder all the responsibility and risk of such an investment, did not look impressed. Obama then let the cat out of the bag, saying:

"I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

He certainly does, and his unguarded statement to a voter in a key swing state is socialist economics distilled to its simplest terms.

Eliminating small business capital gains taxes — whatever the details would be (and you can bet it would be a fraction of total private investment) — will not rescue the middle class from the job losses of a high-tax Obama administration planning to spend an extra $293 billion annually. It does, however, cunningly deaden charges that Obama is camouflaging a socialist agenda.

The other components of his so-called rescue, lovingly described by the New York Times as "proposals to spur new jobs, to give Americans penalty-free access to retirement savings to help them through the downturn, to urge a 90-day moratorium on home foreclosures and to lend money to strapped local and state governments" are worded to sound equally innocuous. But a close look tells another story.

His $3,000 income-tax credit for each new full-time employee hired by businesses is an obvious anti-outsourcing incentive likely to increase business costs, of which we can expect plenty more — of a directly punitive nature — in an Obama administration. He would replace the judgment of banks with that of the federal government regarding when or if to foreclose. And he wants the Federal Reserve and the Treasury to bail out spendthrift state and local governments.

John McCain is reportedly considering a broad, simple capital gains tax cut. An across-the-board cut would be a real middle-class rescue, focused on generating new private sector employment — the proven way of "spreading the wealth around," a concept which Obama, with his deftly disguised socialism, cannot grasp.

Log


I thought a little break from the political scene might be welcome. A co-worker of mine showed me this, and because I enjoy random things, it made me laugh. Hope you enjoy it, too.

What You Should Know About John McCain


What James Dobson had to say about John McCain

John McCain's "Voting Record"

The 411 - Part 1


First there was Jeremiah Write. Then William Ayers. Who else from Mr. Obama's history do we need to know about?

Friends of Obama

Coming tomorrow: What you need to know about McCain.

Alfred E. Smith Dinner


McCain Speaks - Part 1





Part 2




Obama Speaks - Part 1





Part 2

A Humorous Lesson in Taxes


Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar everyday and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers,' he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.'


The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33.

But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

'I only got a dollar out of the $20,' declared the sixth man.

He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!

'Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man.

'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!'

'That's true!' shouted the seventh man.

'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two?
The wealthy get all the breaks!'

'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison.
'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him.

But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works.

The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.

Mickey Mouse Registers to Vote


Please note that the following articles are NOT sponsored by the McCain campaign.

ACORN Registers Mickey Mouse to Vote - tampabay.com

Obama and Acorn - wsj.com

Seven-year-old Registered to Vote - nypost.com

Bonus Video: Obama Says he Wants to "Spread the Wealth" - foxnews.com

Nothing is Not the Worst Thing...


"The worst thing you can do is nothing," BlackRock investment strategist Bob Doll said earlier in the day.

Well sir, I disagree. The worst thing you can do, is the wrong thing. We would have done better to wait and get the right legislation on the table, than to rush the wrong legislation to the table. See the current market status .

The Bailout That Should Have Been


The below plan is, of course, not original to me. I'm not nearly clever enough to think of such a thing; however, I think it would have worked wonders for our economy (and still could), if it were implemented.

This idea is original to Dave Ramsey, and can be found here .


The Common Sense Fix


Years of bad decisions and stupid mistakes have created an economic nightmare in this country,
but $700 billion in new debt is not the answer. As a tax-paying American citizen, I will not support any congressperson who votes to implement such a policy. Instead, I submit the following three-step Common Sense Plan.



  1. INSURANCE


    1. Insure the subprime bonds/mortgages with an underlying FHA-type insurance. Government-insured and backed loans would have an instant market all over the world, creating immediate and needed liquidity.


    2. In order for a company to accept the government-backed insurance, they must do two things:

      1. Rewrite any mortgage that is more than three months delinquent to a 6% fixed-rate mortgage.

        1. Roll all back payments with no late fees or legal costs into the balance. This brings homeowners current and allows them a chance to keep their homes.

        2. Cancel all prepayment penalties to encourage refinancing or the sale of the property to pay off the bad loan. In the event of foreclosure or short sale, the borrower will not be held liable for any deficit balance. FHA does this now, and that encourages mortgage companies to go the extra mile while working with the borrower—again limiting foreclosures and ruined lives.

      2. Cancel ALL golden parachutes of EXISTING and FUTURE CEOs and executive team members as long as the company holds these government-insured bonds/mortgages. This keeps underperforming executives from being paid when they don’t do their jobs.

    3. This backstop will cost less than $50 billion—a small fraction of the current proposal.


  2. MARK TO MARKET


    1. Remove mark to market accounting rules for two years on only subprime Tier III
      bonds/mortgages. This keeps companies from being forced to artificially mark down
      bonds/mortgages below the value of the underlying mortgages and real estate.

    2. This move creates patience in the market and has an immediate stabilizing effect on failing and ailing banks—and it costs the taxpayer nothing.


  3. CAPITAL GAINS TAX


    1. Remove the capital gains tax completely. Investors will flood the real estate and stock market in search of tax-free profits, creating tremendous—and immediate—liquidity in the markets. Again, this costs the taxpayer nothing.

    2. This move will be seen as a lightning rod politically because many will say it is helping the rich. The truth is the rich will benefit, but it will be their money that stimulates the economy. This will enable all Americans to have more stable jobs and retirement investments that go up instead of down.



This is not a time for envy, and it’s not a time for politics. It’s time for all of us, as Americans, to stand up, speak out, and fix this mess.

Charter Post


So to answer the obvious question - what do I mean by "what the cow"?!

Really, this started as a saying that I picked up from a friend, and has now become common in the vernacular used with my closer friends. It's used kind of as a reactionary statement, and has a similar connotation to, "what gives?!"

I'd like to make this site into a discussion ground for quite a broad range of topics; covering anything from electronics and cars, to finances and cooking. While I'll focus quite a bit on the political environment, I'll also post about anything else that piques my interest. Hopefully we'll have enough variation to keep away the boredom bugs.

The outlook on the discussion will come from a Christian worldview, and will seek to be God-honoring.

I hope you enjoy your time here! Please let me know if you have any suggestions for layout, discussion topics, widgets, etc.